Connect with us

trainingDefining “the minimum”…

We live in a world defined by “the minimum”.

We should be getting the minimum daily requirements of our vitamins. We are required to have minimum insurance coverage to [legally] operate a motor vehicle. And many times computer programs and software will not run without minimum memory and hard drive space. In some cases, having some sort of minimum is good. For example, a person would not want to look to see a three-year-old in a booster seat operating the 18-wheeler sitting next to them at a traffic light.

However, unlike setting a minimum age to operate a vehicle, other minimums are actually difficult to put into perspective. What one person might find to be the minimum may be very different from someone else. If you want a good example of that, just go out and ask a couple different people what the minimum qualifications are for someone to hold a political office. That question will spark a huge and often funny debate.

When we begin to talk about minimums in education, the debate becomes even more convoluted. To make matters even worse, terms like “minimum recommended”, “minimum acceptable”, or “minimum standards” get thrown into the conversation. To sound even more politically correct, we may try to soften some of those statements by using the term “core requirements” or “core skills”, which in fact are minimums.

The same holds true when it comes to emergency services training. We even tend to use fancier terms in the emergency services such as “minimum standard of accreditation” or “job performance requirement”. Even having a state or National standard is in essence a minimum.

In most cases, these “minimums” were developed by a small group of people sitting around a table and debating for hours on end to say this is what we think the minimum should be. These folks have been tasked with quantifying and qualifying what the “minimum” should be – an extremely difficult task anytime, but especially when it comes to emergency services responder training.

These groups have to attempt to strike a delicate balance between many social and political factors and come up with a recommendation that they hope will work.

Unfortunately, many times, to remain politically correct, these groups restrict the “minimum” to a set number of hours, or just what they think is just enough knowledge and skills for a responder to be able to go out and maybe do the job. The results of these meetings and debate usually find their way into some document and ultimately a certificate or patch that says, “Yep, this responder met our minimum standard”.

Likewise, emergency services training facilities and instructors look at these defined minimums and standards and many – not all – figure out how to give the student just enough information and skill to meet these standards (and get the patch or certificate). These facilities and instructors have to balance the same social and political debates, and usually add a financial component into the debate. These facilities and instructors have themselves fallen into the “minimum mindset”. It should scare you when you hear an instructor say something like “the students just got by…”

Then there are of course, the emergency responders who look at training from the perspective of doing just what they have to do to get the certificate, patch, or worse the “I can now ride the shiny truck” attitude. They have fallen into the pervasive mindset of “just doing the minimum”.
Since it seems the minimum is what many want to do when it comes to emergency services training, here is a question – define “the minimum”.

In your mind qualify and quantify this word as it relates to emergency services training. Start by defining it in terms of your personal forte. If you are a firefighter, what are the minimum education and skills you need to be a competent, successful, and safe firefighter? If you are a rescue technician, what are the minimum education and skills you need to competently, successfully and safely perform technical rescue? And if you are an emergency services instructor, what is the minimum education and skills your students need to competently, successfully and safely perform the task?

Take some time to think about the questions. Step away from this article for a moment and think in general about what you consider the minimum training to do the job of an emergency responder and/or instructor. Go ahead – walk away for a little while and think about the question. Then come back to this article.

Now that you have returned to this article, what are the answers that came to mind in response to the questions posed? Is your answer something along the lines of completing a certain course, challenging a certification, or completing a certain defined number of hours of training? If the answer is yes, you have fallen into the minimum training mindset. You are not alone.

As an emergency responder and/or instructor, you need to stop thinking about training from the certificate, patch, and/or hour’s perspective. Rather you do need to ask yourself what is the training needed to safely and effectively do the job. And, ask yourself that question not from your perspective as a responder or instructor, but rather from the perspective of your victim.

Mentally play the role as the person trapped under the dashboard in a car that is upside down in a ditch, or the victim hanging out of the third floor window in a burning structure. If you were the one in need of help, what is the level of skill, training, and practice that, you desire (or demand) from the emergency responders coming to your aid?

Will the “minimum skill set” you completed in a certain class to get a certificate be good enough? Does that row of patches up your sleeve mean anything in terms of doing the job? Will the fact that you trained for a “X” number of hours make for a successful rescue?

Does this change in perspective alter your answer? It should. Only when we get out of the “minimum training mentality” and start training in a manner that maximizes are ability to perform skills without hesitation or fail will we meet the needs of our victims?

We will never truly be able to eliminate the “minimum mindset” from our training as emergency responders, but we can alter the mindset.

When it comes your role as an emergency responder or instructor, you need to stop trying to define or even thinking in terms of the minimum. Rather we should train as often and as hard as we need to be the best we can be.

Our lives and the lives of our victims deserve more than our minimum.

Pennsylvania State Fire/Rescue Instructor Vehicle & Machinery Rescue Farm/Agricultural Rescue www.rescuetechs.com

Heavy Rescue

Large Animal Rescue

Working with their past experince, the Patterson Fire Department’s completed their 4th horse rescue in the past several years.

Published

on

Horse Rescue

Per the post from the Patterson Fire Department’s Facebook page:

At 0732, 25th of August 2021, the Patterson fire department was dispatched for a public assist to a local farm. Patterson’s heavy rescue, 22-6-1, arrived on scene and found a 31-year-old male horse, named “Dozer”, in distress. He had apparently fallen and managed to get himself stuck between a rock and a fence line. At first, the crew attempted to assist the horse in getting up by shifting his position. It became apparent that additional equipment was going to be needed to help Dozer out since he had become too exhausted to get up on his own. After some discussion, it was established that the best plan of action was to use a Paratech bipod system. It would be used as an artificial high directional with TU-32 griphoist’s assistance to lift the horse up. With a lot of sweat and effort, the crew was able to lift the horse up onto his feet. After some much-needed fluids and rest, we were happy to see Dozer trot away, unassisted.

An interesting fact, this is Patterson Fire Department’s 4th horse rescue in the past several years, all with successful outcomes.

Photos below from Andrew Akin

Continue Reading

Building Collapse

Rescue Methods BGSU 2021 Rescue Tech Series

Published

on

Bowling Green State University State Fire School Certified Rescue Tech

These courses are NFPA compliant and covers all six disciplines of technical rescue operations. Students will utilize the latest and greatest equipment and will put learned skills to the test in intense hands-on scenarios.

General information on the Certified Rescue Technician Program.

Class Schedule

  • Rope Rescue Technician
  • Water Craft Ops / Swift Water Ops
  • Confined Space Technician
  • Vehicle & Machinery
  • Trench Rescue Technician
  • Structural Collapse Operations

Rescue Methods BGSU 2021 rescue tech series with structural collapse ops.

Continue Reading

Quick Tips

Motor City Monday Extrication Tip; Electric Vehicle Battery Pack Reinforcements

As vehicles change, our knowledge must continue to keep pace and expand our mental toolbox.  The extrication tool manufacters have kept pace with their cutters, spreaders, and rams to combact these strong steels. It’s our job to stay

Published

on

Electric Vehicle Battery Pack Reinforcements

Like everything in life, vehicles are changing, well vehicles keep changing. World leaders are pushing green vehicles which will increase our interactions with electric vehicles.  First off, let’s look at the common acronyms of several common green and traditional vehicles.

  • BEV = Battery Electric Vehicle
  • PHEV = Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle
  • HEV = Hybrid Electric Vehicle
  • ICE = Internal Combustion Engine

Unlike BEV, PHEV, and HEV, the term ICE refers to the engine itself, rather than the type of car. Normal/traditional gasoline and diesel cars have internal combustion engines.

Electric Vehicles present several challenges to firefighters with battery fires leading the way.  The automakers are designing and engineering extremely strong protective cages around battery packs. We are no strangers finding boron, martensite, and press hardened steels in the pillars, roof rails, and fender wells.  However, in a BEV, the rocker panels and cross vehicle reinforcements will have boron and martensite steels to protect the battery pack from collisions that could comprise it.  In the images below, the 2021 Ford Mustang Mach E has this strong steel in the rocker panels and cross vehicle reinforcements.  The automakers can tie in the strong rocker panels into the front fender wells requiring us to make deep cuts during a dash lift or roll.


The image below shows the different testing vehicles are subjected to and a strong battery cage can not only protect the battery pack, but also the occupants of the vehicle.

As vehicles change, our knowledge must continue to keep pace and expand our mental toolbox.  The extrication tool manufacturers have kept pace with their cutters, spreaders, and rams to combat these strong steels. It’s our job to stay current where the automakers are using strong steel.

Images from several Great Designs in Steel (GDIS) 2021 Presentations.

Continue Reading